• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Australia Awaken - ignite your torches

Narratives from Down Under

  • First Light
  • Awards
  • Budget
  • Employment
  • Race
  • Refugees
  • Political
  • Sex
  • Taxes
  • Voting
  • Women.
  • Login & Msgs

Archives for September 2015

911

September 28, 2015 by James J. Morrison W.G. Dupree Leave a Comment

The “War on Terror”

The many excuses for yet another War!
The many excuses for yet another War!

The “War on Terror” conscripted Australia into a prolonged battle on the other side of the world which – despite the protests of thousands of Australians –our PM, John Howard, threw soldiers and armaments (often bought from America) into it.  The mythology of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” – long since repudiated – was the justification for this expensive foray into supporting the American War machine.  There were other reasons of course.  Aren’t there always. <sigh>  Australia under the next Liberal PM, Tony Abbott, once again commenced sending planes and weapons (bought from America) into an insanely expensive foray into attacking ISIS in Syria, yet again in support of the American War machine which generated the ISIS battle ground because of its initial war in Iraq.  In a never ending circle, we will perpetuate this war mongering and create the next generation against which to fight the next war.  The middle East has been a target for Western Democracies ever since supposedly they attacked our allies, the Americans, a decade ago.   Though some would suggest, it goes back even further, for now, I will focus on the common perception.  Interestingly, the attack of 9/11 was predominately carried out by nationalities of other allies of America – Saudi Arabia.  Yet it was Iraq, Afganistan, and Syria that feel our guns upon their backs.  There is much about the 9/11 story from start to finish (which I doubt we have seen yet) that is a story of considerable inconsistencies.  As we have been instigators of and cooperative in, this “War on Terror” for the last decade, it behoves us to question the origins of this involvement in American propaganda and war.

Architects & Engineers

Architects & Engineers for 9-11 Truth logo
Architects & Engineers for 9-11 Truth logo

A decade has passed since 9/11, and yet now a vast number of Americans & others seek a re-evaluation of the FEMA & NIST Investigations into the incident.  Some suggest public discussion of the destruction of the three Trade Center buildings did not occur in a scientific context, but in a highly charged political context.  I spent time some months ago gradually watching an excellent documentary film by “Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth!”.  It concerns itself with the scientific context and does not speculate on the who or why which I find pragmatically relieving.  It examines issues with the FEMA & NIST Investigation reports.   It’s a 2 hour documentary of interviews with engineers, architects, and at the end clinical psychologists because it inevitably needs to deal with the issues of cognitive dissonance that arise.

WTC

The direct and collateral damage zone of 9/11
The direct and collateral damage zone of 9/11

Despite the publicity, the very public nature of the event, the film footage, the investigations officially and unofficially, it remains an event in which misconceptions exist no matter what side of the arguments is peculating around the event you sit on.  For myself the scope of the destruction is intriguing.  It is often discussed regarding the two buildings which were hit and not the collateral damage.  Although Building Seven across the street from and separated from WTC 1 by yet another building, generates an enormous amount of controversy.  The thing about it all was that a total of seven World Trade Center buildings were ultimately destroyed but only two hit by planes.  Yes, there was “collateral damage”.   Two planes ran into the 110-story WTC 1 and 2.  The  47-story WTC 7 across the street was suddenly leveled to the ground in seconds after what appeared to be spot fires (depending on whom you talk to).  It’s collapse, and the speed and nature of its collapse are the single most pointed exception that everyone brings up in defence of something dodgy being afoot, to the alternative being that this is merely collateral damage from the foreign attack.  There are plenty of sites attempting to debunk the conspiratorialists claims about WTC 1 and 2.  The  47-story WTC 7 collapse just doesn’t “sell” as well for they who justify it, having just happened to collapse naturally, despite never having been hit.  It’s always the one the anti-conspirators shy away from or deal with in very perfunctory terms.  In fact, it isn’t even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission report.   Collateral Damage to  WTC 3, 4, 5, and 6 was suffered as large portions of WTC 3, 4, and 6 were also crushed.  Then there were the peripheral buildings outside of the “zone” that was damaged and subsequently torn down.  The nature of which buildings fell or were later demolished is, in of itself, concern for much speculation.

Dodgy film?

Manipulated image or just poor inadequate cameras with a lossy compression algorithm?
Manipulated image or just poor, inadequate cameras with a lossy compression algorithm?

Having suggested there is a conspiracy afoot, it is also evident some of the conspiratorial claims are clearly more obviously nonsense. The one’s that immediately come to mind, from my perspective of a film maker.  There is the folk who suggest it wasn’t a real plane based on footage presumably sourced from a consumer quality camera with undoubtedly a small CMOS chip and limited focus capacity, that was taken by folks in New York with a camera handy.  The other claim is often that the footage was faked and not made by the citizenry.  More likely the footage is probably real but suffers from the problem all such small consumer cameras suffer from – compression technology.  A small lesson in the manner in which pixel capture occurs would be useful.  The compression algorithm inherent in most consumer cameras from a decade ago explains more than an examination of each supposed frame of the collision does.  Subsequent image frames from such cameras are never full frames.  Sometimes only one frame in 25 might capture the full image as each subsequent frame captures only a fragment of what the lens sees to reduce the otherwise large file size nature of what the video file would otherwise be.  When a camera only records limited pixels each frame and the only full frame capture being what is known as an “iframe” (or full frame) then what you play back, is inevitably not what happened.  These cameras are not designed to be examined frame by frame because they don’t store data that way.  They are intended to be watched as running moving images to fool the eye that we are seeing “moving full frame pictures” when we are doing nothing of the sort.  Add to that, that you are filming through a tiny lens with a small charge-coupled device (CCD) or more likely CMOS chips for most consumer cameras.  The CMOS converts the visual data via an algorithm/codec  (generally DV, MPEG-2 or AVCHD) to be compressed before it’s recorded to whatever media the camcorder is using, be it tape, a hard drive, a disc, or a memory card.   Most of the data collected by the CMOS chip of pixels on each frame is simply lost and never recorded, but enough is retained to create the illusions that you can look at each frame one at a time.  Most of the picture is constructed from pixels taken several frames ago with the minimal amount changed to generate the illusion of movement.  The plane doesn’t appear to explode at the exact microsecond of an impact because the pixels are not entirely updated till each iframe occurs.  Instead what you are looking at is a mathematical extrapolation of changing pixels to generate several intermediary partial frames between each iframe.  It’s called lossy compression.  Inaccuracy of positioning of visual data is a reflection of weak or small lens (resulting in visual noise and refractive distortion) and CMOS quality (resulting in skew distortions – especially if the subject is moving fast) but not grounds for a conspiracy about absent planes, or badly video edited evidence for a plane’s non-existence or explosions that appear to be “off-centre”.   It’s more about the extrapolation of data stored by the inferior camera than grounds for doubting the existence of a genuine film or plane or proof of bad editing.  You can look this stuff up yourself.  I am not even going to give it credit by providing links.  Hardly good evidence to be used to claim conspiracy.

Forensic searching

On the other hand, more careful and rigorous science and the investigation is applied in “Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth!” and no speculation as to responsibility.  There is no doubt they have speculated, as many have and still do.  How can one not, when faced with the weight of evidence and the dubious way the FEMA & NIST investigation was conducted?   There are innumerable videos and commentaries on that and entire lobby groups dedicated to questioning their procedure. Determining what might have happened is a forensic search of shifting through the dust of evidence and that is what this film attempts to do.

Tea Party

In the interest of never letting facts get in the way of a good story
In the interest of never letting facts get in the way of a good story

Not that this proves anything or finds any specific group responsible, mind you.  There is an entire community in America represented by the “Tea Party” adherents who believe half a dozen impossible things before breakfast.  Often accused of lacking education and rational thinking, the Tea party lobby for “changes” in American infrastructure, medical care and politics based on presumptions about their government and culture outside observers here in Australia might suggest is based on dubious evidence.  America abounds in “crazies” in rather unique ways.  So if America is the land of the conspiratorial and the paranoid, does this, in itself, invalidate theories that suggest 9/11 is not what it is sold to us as?  Logically not, but emotive reactions to the proposal that there might be something to the theories, usually sway one’s beliefs, to ignore evidence to the contrary.  To put it in the terms of the classic cliche: “Just because your paranoid, doesn’t mean your wrong!”.  The documentary is although worth looking at ( the link here again ), then by all means look at the claims from it’s detractors.

Consequences

Consequences of 9/11
Consequences of 9/11

It is unlikely that the truth will come out while the possible perpetrators are still alive and possibly are in position to ensure detailed investigations are “delayed” and obfuscated.  Misdirection and misinformation are the tools of war as Sun Tzu pointed out and in the battle for the truth for 9/11 we are at war with an unknown enemy who knows this well.  In the meantime, whatever your views, the event was a catalyst for innumerable crimes and illegal or dubious forays into the wider world by the American War machine.  The death toll of 9/11 pales in comparison to the actions and deaths that were generated by these subsequent events.  Irrespective of what you may believe or who you blame for 9/11, it is very clear who was responsible for it’s aftermath. “Truth” is the first victim in this form of war and that is the nature of the world we live in, sadly!

Filed Under: Foreign

Aylan

September 4, 2015 by James J. Morrison W.G. Dupree Leave a Comment

The fate of Syrian refugees if we continue our abuse, our wars, our justifications.
The fate of Syrian refugees if we continue our abuse, our wars, our justifications.

When will we understand?
Our gulags need be canned!
When will we open the doors?
And release the prisoners of wars!
When will we try to seek?
To raise our voice and speak!
When will we find the truth?
Hidden by lies uncouth!
When will we acknowledge our race?
Has to answer a criminal case!
When will we open our eyes?
To the damage, we cause with our lies!
When will we finally believe?
All people equally grieve!
When will we seek to strive?
To have love – our hearts – to drive!

Not today, not here, not now
Till we make compassion a vow!
When there is nothing left to defend,
Only then, will all of this end!

…

 

We need to change who we are!

… (continued thoughts) …

I first saw the actual photo of this child in the wee hours this morning, as I was finishing off another article. Confronted by it, I wrote the poem above completing it around two in the morning, as I could not sleep. Having in some manner expressed my feelings I eventually crashed to bed. I woke as my son as usual jumped into our bedroom, begrudging his enthusiasm for being awake and alive. The image of this boy a few years older than my son haunted me. Once my son was at school, I began to explore his story. The image had gone viral and the reactions diverse. Some understandable and others are perplexing.

One reaction, which I have only recently become educated about, appears to be one of regarding it as “emotional porn” or “clickbait” and that somehow just mentioning it or how it makes us feel or what his death represents, dehumanises the boy. I would have thought it was exactly the opposite. It is the tragedy, the senselessness, and the horror of this, that humanises him in a way that we have not done, for thousands of refugees who died before this little boy.

I admit to having difficulties getting my head around this idea, so I am quoting someone else to try to get a sense of it and understand the objectionableness. It’s the use of the image of the boy as “a tool for others to use to promote or condemn anything“. (I am quoting here)   We use images, stories, allegories from innumerable sources joyful, sad, uplifting and tragic to “promote or condemn” everything. How else do we as human beings address issues, build relationships between ideas, talk about life if not to illustrate it with our experiences, images, fears, loves, gut-wrenching retelling (in this case)? It is people’s visceral reaction to these pictures and the lobbying it generated that have induced Britain to announce intent to admit thousands of Syrian refugees into their country. It’s how we communicate as human beings. Why is this off-limits? How does this fail to give “regard to him as a human being“?

I tried to draw a parallel with the way our news services regularly show no regard for privacy to families in various breakdowns, calamities and dramas, in what the media benignly calls “public interest“. Perhaps it is the perspective revealed from our society’s turgid appetite for virtual reality shows and the manufactured breakdowns within them because it brings out the ugly underside of humanity. I understand why someone might object to these. These aspects of human behaviour, example and imagery that rarely have outcomes or influences that might elicit higher morality, compassion, an end to bullying, violence, war and oppression, that this story will. In fact, the former example seems to bring to the surface the racism, bullying and dysfunctional responses. This story is entirely about our regard for him as a human being and the tragedy of it all. Perhaps, although, it is all a matter of personal psychology. People who are genuinely altruistic react to such images and want to engage with it.

Personalities who aren’t altruistic, want to put it aside, out of sight and avoid being confronted with it. Then there are folks who are incapable of understanding emotional reactions at all. Which is a good segue to the official opinion of our prime minister, Tony Abbott? The political discourse is eclipsing human emotional response as Abbott attempts to twist this into fitting his agenda of “Stopping the Boats”. He sees its use as an instrument of political justification. Now there is someone who “uses this child’s image without regard to him as a human being”. (I am quoting again here) Social media has been understandably hostile to this suggestion.

Aylan’s image is becoming one of those seminal images like that of little Kim Phúc from the village of Trang Bang in South Vietnam running naked amidst other fleeing villages. It changed a nation’s attitude to the Vietnam War. Already the British government is reacting. Abbott and company seem unable to respond similarly. So aside from them, the rest of us are human, parents, grandparents and many of us capable of emotion and altruism. We must be the conscience, our leadership isn’t capable of, and rise to embrace this for the sake of the “Aylans” that will otherwise wash to shore. If only to bring about the sort of change the very scared little girl, Kim once did for America. While there is little we can to for Aylan or his family, Aylan’s death can have the power of life for thousands of Syrian refugees and given Brittan’s reaction, he already has.

In regards to Abdullah Kurdi, the father of Aylan as a human being and in regards to the feelings and rights of his family, he at least knows his son will be remembered and honoured. This tragedy, although, does not end here. Abdullah Kurdi has discontinued his efforts to go to Europe. He has lost both his children and his wife. He simply wants to take his family’s bodies back into the danger-zone he left to bury his family in Kobani. He also has stated he wants to stay there now, after having spent so much time and effort fleeing from there. I don’t think he cares anymore if he lives or dies by returning there. Some might think his returning there is suicidal and he probably would agree. In fact, were I him, and I had lost what he has lost, I would probably thank the first I.S. fighter I encountered in his troubled land, who put a gun to my head.

Kobane, Syria after the U.S. & Arab coalition planes bombed and ISIS militants attacked
Kobani, Syria after the U.S. & Arab coalition planes bombed and ISIS militants attacked

?

Kobane in Syria before the bombing of the city
Kobani in Syria before the bombing of the city

 

 

 

 

 

 

—//—

Postscript 2020

It has been nearly half a decade since I wrote this and still, Australian’s continue to mistreat refugees escaping from the horrors from which young Aylan and his family fled.  His image touched the world, yet the refugee situation has worsened. In the two years, that followed 8,500 people drowned in the Mediterranean, 1,150, were children “. In October of 2019, Reuters announced “More than 1,000 migrants and refugees have died in the Mediterranean Sea this year, the sixth year in a row that this “bleak milestone” has been reached, the United Nations said on Tuesday.”  And what of the memory and impact of Aylan?  I have only this illustration to say everything I need to.

Collective memory is always short-term
Collective memory is always short-term

 

 

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Filed Under: Foreign, Refugees

Primary Sidebar

Search for what you seek:

Recent backchat

  • Pass the Baton - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on A Climate of Opinion.
  • Casting Light on Marriage - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on Coming Out
  • Coming Out - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on Marriage by Definition
  • Coming Out - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on Dear Eric
  • Coming Out - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on Casting Light on Marriage

Archives

  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014

Categories

  • Awards
  • Budget
  • Climate Change
  • Corruption
  • Employment
  • Environment
  • Foreign
  • Health
  • Indigenous
  • Partisan
  • Politicians
  • Privatisation
  • Race
  • Refugees
  • Religous
  • Satire
  • Sexuality
  • Taxes
  • Voting
  • Women
  • writing

Copyright © 2023 · Auswakeup Media · Log in

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.