• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Australia Awaken - ignite your torches

Narratives from Down Under

  • First Light
  • Awards
  • Budget
  • Employment
  • Race
  • Refugees
  • Political
  • Sex
  • Taxes
  • Voting
  • Women.
  • Login & Msgs

Archives for November 2014

Disengagement

November 24, 2014 by James J. Morrison W.G. Dupree Leave a Comment

Political disengagement is a crime
Political disengagement is a crime

White Australia as people appear both hedonistic and politically disengaged and strangely proud of the fact. Being apolitical as a point of pride is not allowed by our oversea’s brethren.  People from without who have had to struggle, face discrimination and encounter death and torture in the political process are less willing to be so complacent.  Australian by in large have no real experience and little sympathy with that struggle as evidenced by their unsympathetic reaction to refugees.  While I have lived overseas in the midst of a political revolution, I am a multigenerational Australian and a bit of a rarity I suspect.  My wife and I were both educated at Private schools, brought up by Conservative families. My wife has an MBA to add to her other four degrees, (I’m less educated with only three). We are self-employed although both have significant histories of working for the private sector and public sector employers (in Transport, Banking {-me only}, Insurance {- her only}, Finance, Mining, Education, Health), own our own homes and are not impoverished.  In many respects a middle-class nuclear church going Anglo family and yet despite being a potential LNP voting demography, we find ourselves at odds with the political climate in Australia.

The moral evil of Neutrality
The moral evil of Neutrality

Australians are often found following the example of conforming with the un-thought-out voting position of one’s family.  They are more often intransigent in their voting position, regardless of the situation or the facts available so readily in this contemporary age of internet access to information.  The “writing was very obviously on the wall” for what sort of a leader Abbott would be well before the election, so there is no excuse for this level of intellectual laziness other than to protest that for some inexplicable reason, one believed his lies.  Or that of Murdock’s papers which we swallowed uncritically and without considered thought.  So how do you engage this intellectually lazy population? Unfortunately, it would have to be suffering the leadership of an inherent sociopath/fascist like Abbott and experiencing the consequences.  A harsh lesson which our society will undoubtedly suffer from now and well into the future, as Abbott and his colleagues continue dismantling the infrastructure of our once egalitarian society.  Sadly, it is probably only in experiencing this pain, which we will generate engagement in politics.  Providing any of them a second term will most surely be irretrievably damaging as everything that provides a buffer against poverty and hardship is dismantled.

Filed Under: Voting

Why vote

November 23, 2014 by James J. Morrison W.G. Dupree Leave a Comment

Time to do some thinking about why?
Time to do some thinking about why?

Okay, so you’re considering voting for the Coalition based on their policies? They are seeking a second term. How have you been thinking about this? Hope you don’t mind if I ask but which one of Abbott’s grand policies (that Malcolm hasn’t changed) was it that has maintained your desire to have either or any of them as your Prime Minister?

What could it be?

  • Was the opportunity to drive up and down the new roads being built between and in our cities, despite the trend away from it in other western nations, while incurring higher petrol prices to do that?
  • Was it that folks continue to enjoy prosperous employment opportunities, assuming of course you are not a public servant or work in manufacturing  or education or nursing, or public broadcasting, or air transport, public communications authorities or anything to do with conservation or climate management, because the Government “cuts” (of efficiency dividends) might put you at risk?
  • Perhaps it was the opportunity to live a very cheap and free-spirited life on the streets for months of the year, should you be one of the increasing numbers of these unemployed people that Australia has now close to 2 million (or 800K if you follow the tightly statistically controlled measurement the government prefers you reference) people?  (Roy Morgan’s Stats preferred)
  • Perhaps it was the opportunities available to you to get a higher education complete with a higher debt level for the rest of your life?
  • Perhaps, if you’re a woman, you’re encouraged by their sensitivity and support for women’s issues in his role as the Minister for women, such as over 60,000 domestic violence cases, reduction in Shelters, fair & equal pay, misogyny and his support for you while you’re ironing your husband’s clothes?  Giving back $100M after you have taken $300M doesn’t count.
  • Perhaps if you’re gay, you’re conscious of their awareness of homophobic considerations, and what support Abbott/Malcolm will – as a devout Catholic – provide for you?
  • Perhaps if you’re a journalist, or blogger or involved in any information sharing role, it’s the extra security you feel knowing that you only have to write in support of “Team Australia” and that you don’t need to worry yourself about matters pertaining to the grubby issues of abuse of power and political corruption?
  • Perhaps you’re a property developer or in construction, and you know that the money you donate to that third party organisation,  will unexpectedly turn out to be generous in passing on your largess to members of the Liberal Party?
  • Perhaps you’re in the Mafia, and you know you have the best political party money can buy.
  • Perhaps if you’re an artist, of any kind, you’re encouraged by the realisation that you have to go out and get a “real job” (perhaps in retail)  because there is no party policy or increased support for the arts from this government?
  • Perhaps if you’re not an Australian born, you are aware of his stand on racist fear-mongering over wars in countries far across the sea, and his humanitarian bombs he is dropping on your relatives to forestall the tides of war that apparently intimately threaten us?
  • Perhaps if you are a true Australian born – whose ancestry originates before white settlement – you’ll be aware of how conscious they are of your existence, and that of your ancestors in the wild Bushland that constituted the Australia Abbott talked of, before 200 years ago?
  • Perhaps it was the chance to continue working far beyond what you once thought was your retirement age, and the increased insurgency of medical costs due to the increasingly diverse means of extracting a co-payment from you, that you will no doubt face as you get older?
  • Perhaps it’s because of the preservation and conservation concerns his government has towards the ageing population of “copper infrastructure” that makes up our national network and ensures that we will never have to worry about being competitive with Third World countries like India and their high-speed Internet?
  • Perhaps it is the opportunity he is giving other country’s companies to direct how we can legislate to protect our country’s interest, and in sure that we do not hinder their trade embargoes on cheaper medicines and the like?
  • Perhaps it was from some perverse curiosity of just how far and how large the deficit could grow while the “adults” were in charge and perhaps to curiously observe whether the Treasurer will give yet another $9 billion away to the RBA in the hope that the Australian dollar does eventually collapse?
  • Perhaps it’s because you know you don’t want to have those bastard refugees coming here and stealing your job, with the sure knowledge that they will be beaten and abused until they go back to where from they came?  Unless of course, they have a 457 Visa and then you are happy for them to compete with you for the 160,200 jobs that you and 800K (or 1,186K depending on which stats you follow) Australians have to compete with along with over 103K 457 Visa entrants?
  • Perhaps it’s because you have a fluid relationship to things like reality, truth and lies, such that it doesn’t matter to you whether there is any truth in anything that Mr Abbott or Mr Turnbull says?  Perhaps you’re invigorated intellectually by the adroit and concise manner in which either of them inspired you in his speeches?
  • Perhaps it’s because you had (even for a year) the opportunity to acquire a knighthood or be referred to as Dame so-and-so as you walk down the streets in your robes?
  • Perhaps it is the international recognition he gives to important foreign dignitaries when he hands over our knighthoods to British Royalty and our “Order Of Australia” to Japanese generals.
  • Perhaps it is his keen and scientific intellect that can find the minuscule faults in the science promoted by 99% of the world’s scientific community and with his sharp and insightful mind declare Anthropomorphic Climate change as “crap” or – in Turnbull’s case – only of “direct action” despite having previously thought that was “crap”?
  • Perhaps it is his support for jobs in the Mining sector, which – even though it employs less than 2% of the Australia population – enjoys the benefit of the largess of billion in subsidies by this government?
  • Perhaps his great concern over this minority Mining group losing their jobs is seen as indicative of his over all concern for industry labour markets that have the potential to employ far greater numbers.  For example such as the Renewable Energy sector that he is set on reducing!??

How fair is any of that?  I must admit, I am very curious to know which of these aspects have so captured over 40% of the population’s imagination and enthusiasm for Tony Abbott/Malcolm Turnbull that they are keen to give either another go at leading our country in the next term?  Perhaps some of you can help me out in understanding the issues?

Filed Under: Voting

Jail time

November 16, 2014 by James J. Morrison W.G. Dupree Leave a Comment

A perspective from behind Barbed wire
A perspective from behind Barbed wire

When someone suggests that they don’t have the slightest problem with the coalition’s asylum policies I wonder if they have a perspective on exactly how these asylum seekers are treated.  Three reports have been generated about their treatment.  The Human Right’s Commission produced one during the Labor administration and then another during the Liberal Administration of the Asylum camps.  Then the Liberal Government commissioned an independent report on Manus Island (The Moss report).   All of them said essentially that the treatment of Asylum seekers was appalling for a variety of reasons.

Given that seeking asylum is not illegal, therefore these people have done no wrong, so why is that treatment so much worse than those who have done wrong. If I were to commit murder and then be sent to jail for this crime, I would be given three square meals daily, I would have a comfortable bed to sleep in, in a secure, robust facility. I would be allowed exercise, reading, rehabilitation opportunities and all manner of facilities provided to me. Frankly if given a choice of my crimes, I would rather commit an act of violence, and it’s consequential jail term then suffer the fate afforded innocent people trying to escape violence.  Consider what Australia normally considers a convicted prisoner’s treatment should be while incarcerated.

“GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PRISONERS” from the Australian Department of Justice.
“Correctional services in Australia seek to improve and maintain the safety of and confidence in the correctional system by managing prisoners consistently and with reference to the guiding principles that prisoners are:
1. Managed and contained in a safe, secure, humane manner.
2. Managed equitably, with recognition of their diverse needs.
3. Actively engaged to make positive behaviour change (inclusive of accessing intervention programmes, education, vocational education and work opportunities) with the aims of preparing them for their participation in and return to the community, as well as reducing re-offending behaviour.
4. Provided opportunity to make reparation to the community.
5. Managed consistent with the Acts and Regulations applicable to each jurisdiction, and the sentences and requirements imposed by the Courts.
6. Held at a level of security which is commensurate with the level of risk posed by that prisoner.
7. Where practicable, placed in correctional facilities with a regard to their community of interest and other support needs.
8. Supervised fairly and consistently with the aims of encouraging positive behaviours and maintaining security.
9. Provided with access to health care, to the same standard as in the community, in response to need, with an appropriate range of preventative services, and promoting continuity with external health services upon release.”
Now given that is how we are supposed to treat thieves, murderers and rapists in our community have a real look at how we treat refugees.  Compare any of this requirement with what we treat people who have done nothing illegal and merely sought to escape from people who act in the same manner as they which we deem imprisonable!   We refer to these innocent people as Refugees but treat them as worse than criminal!  So how do we treat them?
Imagine if it were your child imprisoned?
Imagine if it were your child imprisoned?

Given what I read in the Moss Report (which is very carefully & legally worded and redacted), it still paints a horrific story.  These children and their mothers mentioned in the report will likely never recover from the effects of their abuse.  That our politicians allowed this abuse on their watch and were reluctant to investigate is reprehensible.  Were it your children you would be screaming blue murder, but because it isn’t, we prefer complacency.  It is very evident from the Moss report that if Sarah Hanson Young had not pressured Morrison to have Moss investigate the allegations and then, only do so to garner evidence (not found) for the unfounded accusations against Save the Children staff; that report would not exist.  The redacted Moss Review report is available at http://www.immi.gov.au/about/dept-info/_files/review-conditions-circumstances-nauru.pdf  Now keep in mind this is the government’s sponsored report NOT the Human Right’s Commissioner’s report.  So if you are aligning yourself with some view that the HR report was “partisan” then what do you say about a report of even worse abuses produced and commissioned by the LNP Government?

While the official reports are a terrible indictment of what Australia has done in our name, and these are available for anyone to look up.  The reality is that most people will not bother.  On the other hand, a first-hand story told by a Mother in the camp may engage you and hopefully educate you.  Click and read.

http://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/opinion/topic/2014/10/25/open-letter-living-the-hell-called-nauru/14141556001165

Filed Under: Refugees

Primary Sidebar

Search for what you seek:

Recent backchat

  • Pass the Baton - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on A Climate of Opinion.
  • Casting Light on Marriage - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on Coming Out
  • Coming Out - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on Marriage by Definition
  • Coming Out - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on Dear Eric
  • Coming Out - Australia Awaken - ignite your torches on Casting Light on Marriage

Archives

  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014

Categories

  • Awards
  • Budget
  • Climate Change
  • Corruption
  • Employment
  • Environment
  • Foreign
  • Health
  • Indigenous
  • Partisan
  • Politicians
  • Privatisation
  • Race
  • Refugees
  • Religous
  • Satire
  • Sexuality
  • Taxes
  • Voting
  • Women
  • writing

Copyright © 2023 · Auswakeup Media · Log in

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.